Skip to content

OAPE-148: Promote CPMSMachineNamePrefix feature gate to default feature set #2254

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

chiragkyal
Copy link
Member

@chiragkyal chiragkyal commented Mar 31, 2025

Promote CPMSMachineNamePrefix feature gate to default feature set

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Hello @chiragkyal! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 31, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and mandre March 31, 2025 08:41
@chiragkyal chiragkyal changed the title Promote CPMSMachineNamePrefix feature gate to default feature set OAPE-148: Promote CPMSMachineNamePrefix feature gate to default feature set Apr 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 2, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2025

@chiragkyal: This pull request references OAPE-148 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 6, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/test verify-feature-promotion

@chiragkyal chiragkyal force-pushed the promote-machineNamePrefix branch from ab8362b to cf5f806 Compare April 11, 2025 20:02
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 11, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {vsphere amd64 ha }
error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {metal amd64 ha ipv4}
error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {metal amd64 ha ipv6}
error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {metal amd64 ha dual}
error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {aws amd64 ha }
error: only 0 tests found, need at least 5 for "CPMSMachineNamePrefix" on {azure amd64 ha }

It's not able to fetch the jobs, even though they exist.
https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/tests/4.19/details?filters=%7B%22items%22%3A%5B%7B%22columnField%22%3A%22name%22%2C%22operatorValue%22%3A%22contains%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22FeatureGate%3ACPMSMachineNamePrefix%5D%22%7D%5D%7D

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

There is an issue with the verify feature promotion at the moment, I'm investigating

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/test verify-feature-promotion

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Looking at the current feature promotion data, we don't have enough runs to be able to pass this right now. Could you please trigger 10 runs using gangway on each of AWS, Azure, GCP and vSphere.

This feature doesn't work on metal platforms so we will have to except the metal platform requirements here

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

Looking at the current feature promotion data, we don't have enough runs to be able to pass this right now. Could you please trigger 10 runs using gangway on each of AWS, Azure, GCP and vSphere.

I had triggered 3-5 jobs in all these platforms. Might need to trigger more.

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/test verify-feature-promotion

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 15, 2025

@chiragkyal: This pull request references OAPE-148 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Promote CPMSMachineNamePrefix feature gate to default feature set

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/test verify-feature-promotion

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 15, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

@JoelSpeed I think we have sufficient runs now, verify-feature-promotion is failing due to the metal platform only.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

This feature does not support metal platforms, all others have passed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chiragkyal, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 22, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

There are issues with the serial techpreview right now, the suite itself ran to completion yesterday in this rune, with a single failure.

Given the nature of this feature and that this is a promotion PR, and the normal serial suite passed, and the feature isn't in use for the conformance suite anyway, I think it is safe to override on this occasion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

Per #2254 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 22, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

Per #2254 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9aa03e6 and 0 for PR HEAD cf5f806 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 9aa03e6 and 2 for PR HEAD cf5f806 in total

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

Oh my tide! How many times will you retest :(
/retest-required

@shellyyang1989
Copy link

@chiragkyal The change is for 4.20 right? It'll be merged after branching huh? Just checking in case our tests need any update accordingly.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Feature not applicable to metal, everything else passing

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

This should be fixed now

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Feature not applicable to metal, everything else passing

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

This should be fixed now

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

@shellyyang1989 The changes will land in 4.19, which means we will GA the feature in 4.19

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@shellyyang1989
Copy link

@chiragkyal Thanks for letting me know. May I know why we are changing the plan?

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 23, 2025

@chiragkyal: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn cf5f806 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 23, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Speaking with @shellyyang1989 we are ok to move forward with this

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 24, 2025
@chiragkyal
Copy link
Member Author

Speaking with @shellyyang1989 we are ok to move forward with this
/hold cancel

Hope @huali9 was looped into the discussion.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD eb41266 and 2 for PR HEAD cf5f806 in total

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 24, 2025

/override ci/prow/images ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/images, ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/images ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 24, 2025

/override ci/prow/integration

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/integration

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/integration

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 24, 2025

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-feature-promotion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson sdodson merged commit 1ee228b into openshift:master Apr 24, 2025
16 of 25 checks passed
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 24, 2025

Merging manually to avoid endless retests on changes.

@chiragkyal chiragkyal deleted the promote-machineNamePrefix branch April 24, 2025 15:22
@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202504241659.p0.g1ee228b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants